I recently had the pleasure of analyzing a mass amount of healthcare websites to view how they were portraying themselves to the public. I learned many, many, many interesting things but the one that got to me as I see this with many many other brands in different industries is this. One of the sites, see below:
relative to the other sites I analyzed looked pretty run of the mill site. Not to spectacular but not to shabby either. The only thing that was intriguing to me and I'm sure anyone else who wandered onto the site was the funny looking man with the glasses next to
The Flu and You article at the bottom of the site. So of course I clicked on it and when opening found a very interesting and engaging sort of campaign effort:
From what I gather this micro site is supposed to help change the way people view their insurance, as boring and the driest of the dry subjects of all. This execution attempts to dish out health tips through videos and odd but funny topics. Seemingly simple and pretty hilarious it struck me as odd why this would be such a minor part of the main site when this idea could have been integrated further into it to give the brand a unique look, feel and point of view. Especially given the fact that the main site itself is nothing spectacular.
I've seen this happen with many brands I've worked on. Many conservative brands briefs us and want edgy ideas. They're ready this time for a change, to show the world they can keep up. They want to be the next Apple, Nike or Google. Then once its ready to make a decision, they falter and want to extract anything not within their comfort zone or they buy it but don't give it much push as we can clearly see from the example above. Now I understand these types of ideas aren't for everyone or for every brand but if everyone does come on board and actually buys into it why hide it?
If you're going to try an idea, consume it, own it, live it breath it eat it otherwise save your money and don't do it because a mediocre effort is like no effort at all. Boringly good is a great idea but sitting in that corner it really doesn't have much value as an execution or for the brand at all.
Which brings me to another topic of what marketers are scared of. I take it that its a huge investment on their end and ruffling of any feathers could not only hurt their bottom line but in this day and age their job as well. But in this day and age as well not taking a risk is just as risky as taking one and continuing to sit on the fence doesn't put you or the brand anywhere. It just leaves you on the fence.
For those living in dread, never has the PR adage of any new is good news been so true today. In case of a true hiccup of accepting an edgy campaign and falling on your face, we have to remember if it moves the needle for your brand in terms of attention, opinion, awareness, this is always better than sitting in the middle and having no one know you at all. We have to remember that the American people are very forgiving, we have short memories and we are suckers for a comeback story. Regardless of the falter, we like to see people and brands revive themselves from the dead.
I get that these failings can be costly but many brands even the not so good ones have come back from it - Hello Mattel and lead paint. What about Firestone & Ford's faulty tires, JetBlue and the delays - these are all brands, good brands, that took major spills but picked themselves back up and still survive today. People forgive if you're genuinly sorry. I mean we welcomed Britney Spears back with wide open arms, right? And look at her now........